Esmail Idani

A lung specialist who has held positions in Iran’s Ministry of Well being and the Nationwide Medical Council, now has two retractions and 5 corrections to his printed papers for re-use of the textual content.

Within the case of a return, the reused textual content was a whole paper.

Esmaeil Idani (who additionally spells his final identify “Idani”), now affiliated with the Shahid Beheshti College of Medical Sciences in Tehran, is a center creator on two papers which were withdrawn for republication, and two of his papers. Corrections to letters settle for duplicate textual content with one another. And the third paper.

In response to a web-based CV, Idani has served as “Deputy Secretary of the Council of Medical Training and Coaching” for Iran’s Ministry of Well being and Medical Training, and was chairman of Iran’s Supreme Medical Council from 2013–2017. He has not responded to our request for remark.

In 2019, Idani and colleagues printed “The impact of family-centered studying based mostly on a well being perception mannequin on data and attitudes amongst mother and father of kids with bronchial asthma: a randomized managed scientific trial.” Jundishapur Journal of Persistent Illness Care,

A yr later, an article with the identical title was printed in Nursing and Midwifery Journal, In response to our database, final August that paper was withdrawn through which no discover was printed.

The withdrawal discover story for the primary paper, printed in January, tells the story:

We’ve withdrawn this text (1) on account of a request from the Editor-in-Chief on behalf of the Editorial Board and the second Committee on Ethics on the Writer. To learn extra withdrawal rules within the writer, please learn it at This text has been withdrawn from our journal following a report by a whistleblower (December 6, 2020) and since it was already printed in one other journal ( -fa.html) has been printed. ) and “republishing”.

Primarily based on our coverage (, any republishing (in different languages) is prohibited. Moreover, the authors failed to elucidate why it’s related to breed it in a distinct context in one other journal with out the permission of the primary journal. Additional, the matter was not appropriately cross-referenced within the acknowledgment part. We’re dedicated to observe up on any suspected misconduct case within the main and secondary committees. To learn extra about method moral claims (allegations of misconduct), please learn the web page beneath:

final august, Worldwide Journal of Biometeorology Related corrections had been printed for 2 papers printed in 2018, on which Idani was a center creator, “Well being Threat Evaluation on People Publicity to Heavy Metals in Ambient Air PM10 in Ahvaz, Southwest Iran,” and Affiliation between most cancers danger and publicity to polycyclic fragrant hydrocarbons within the ambient air of Ahvaz, southwest of Iran.

The reforms accepted the textual content repeated with an earlier publication in one other journal:

Though the main focus of our article (Goudarzi et al. 2018a) experiences novel information and I’ve a distinct focus than our different publication.Worldwide Journal of Biometeorology (Goudarzi et al. 2018b) and our publication venom assessment (Gaudarzi 2017), we acknowledge that we have now copied among the textual content. We apologize for the undue overlap between our three publications and the dearth of transparency relating to the similarities between these articles.

A repair for 2017 venom assessment The paper referenced, “Confederations of outdoor air polycyclic fragrant hydrocarbons in Ahvaz, southwest Iran throughout warm-cold climate,” was printed final October 12. It didn’t point out the duplicate textual content with the opposite papers, but it surely did add disclosure particulars for Idani, the second creator:

Since publication, questions have been raised about particular timelines for when the research was performed, moral approval, and the outline of competing pursuits info.

The authors have now offered the mandatory info. As well as, a paragraph that was erroneously positioned inside the “Moral Issues” part has now been moved to the tip of the “Statistical Evaluation” part.

The modifications in every part are listed beneath:


On this retrospective research, we used an energetic technique to measure the quantity of air PAHs in industrial, high-traffic and residential areas throughout scorching (1 September–20 November) and chilly (1 December–28 February) south-west of Iran. Sampling system was used. 2016-2017 season.

moral issues

The Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur College of Medical Sciences permitted the research protocol. This research was initially permitted by Ahvaz Jundishapur College of Medical Sciences with code IR.AJUMS.REC.1395.492.

Statistical evaluation

Sampling and information assortment had been carried out by the researcher and we analyzed PAH information by Excel and SPSS software program (SPSS model 16; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). We estimated PAH ranges and in contrast them with nationwide requirements for out of doors air in industrial, high-traffic and residential areas.

disclosure assertion

E. Idani has held a number of authorities positions within the Ministry of Well being and the Nationwide Medical Council, and was chancellor of the federal government college of Ahvaz Jundishapur College of Medical Sciences, which offered monetary help for the research. The authors affirm that these roles and every other authorities positions or membership of related committees didn’t have an effect on the outcomes of the analysis.

We requested the editor-in-chief of venom assessment Why is the duplicate textual content not talked about with the correction Worldwide Journal of Biometeorology papers, however did not hear again.

one other venom assessment The paper, “Traits, sources and well being dangers of atmospheric PM10-bound heavy metals in a populated Center Jap metropolis”, which has Idani as first creator, was corrected final October with comparable language:

Since publication, questions have been raised about particular timelines for when the research was performed, moral approval, and particulars of competing pursuits info. As well as, Determine 1 was initially printed by the authors group in an earlier publication, however a reference to the unique supply was not included.

The authors have now offered the mandatory info. As well as, a sentence that was mistakenly positioned inside the “Moral Issues” part has now been moved to the tip of the “Statistical Evaluation” part.

Idani’s fifth enchancment for 2019 atmospheric ambiance Paper Do Conocarpus erectus airborne pollen grains exacerbate bronchial asthma assaults throughout autumn thunderstorms in Ahvaz, Iran? Description “Some minor errors within the context of the unit expression.”

Like Retraction Watch? you can also make one Tax-deductible contributions to help our workobserve us on twitterlike us On Fbadd us to your rss readeror subscribe to our every day Digest, Should you get a refund which is not in our databaseyou’ll be able to inform us right here, For feedback or suggestions, e-mail us at,

Supply hyperlink